Central and peripheral populations and the peripheral and central nervous system share some similar properties. Both are complex. The more widely distributed data systems are more adaptable. The take in information differently. They have a wider scope of interest to the more centralized data processes.
The central nervous systems most immediate sensors are for volume and pressure, oxygen and carbon dioxide, and osmolality, the density of solutes in suspension. Temperature can relate to both the parasympathetic and sympathetic, and can thus can also be inhibitory or excitatory. These processes are shared by individuals and society.
Central and peripheral populations and the peripheral and central nervous system share some similar properties. Both are complex. The more widely distributed data systems are more adaptable. The take in information differently. They have a wider scope of interest relative to the more centralized data processes.
The central nervous systems most immediate sensors are for volume and pressure, oxygen and carbon dioxide, and osmolality, the density of solutes in suspension. Temperature can relate to both the parasympathetic and sympathetic, and can thus can also be inhibitory or excitatory. These processes are shared by individuals and society.
For a long time now, societies have been dominated by a centralized authority. The development of individuals who think they are each the golden rule of the orthodox narrow protocols of the centralized authority, is especially pronounced in America.
Central, Peripheral, why do people adhere so rigidly to centralized orthodoxy? The central authority is more rigid than they are. And that is what they aspire to by society's conditioning. conformity.
In addition to neurological reactivity's contribution to narrowing contexts it has a behavioral component.
Obviously we are reaching, or have passed this point fairly recently in a America, 1900’s for sure. The development of this reduced ability to con7sider, understand, relate is significantly diminished in Americans. How significantly? We will have a much better understanding of that functionality through these reflections.
DESIGN
Design follows in a similar manner leaving out the same kinds of elements that the rest of society does as it passes it’s peak of diversity, and begins to fall into rigid, prepackaged, orthodox central authority networks protocols. As that network gains influence by its protocols, humanitarian natures begin to be displaced. Many are removed geographically. Forced out of their own country. The simplicity of protocol society (one of the stages) maintains an easily influenced social network. The shift to other interests is also a shift in neurology. Different neurological structures, and their many perisperhal networks, also shut dominance of activity in a similar way. All these things occur in a organic network. The becomes chronic entanglement. Another aspect of dominant enmeshment. (dominant enmeshment, early biological development, selectivity, now selectivity with specialization. A highly concentrated, myopic view. These leave out silent evidences. Reinforce a representation that is inverted. The most important considerations and concerns are inverted. The useless is seen as the best reference. marker, idea. The protocol and the signaling reinforce each other. Both producing the most delusional position. Socially, a number of protocols displace human connection. Economics. Ideas, Trade. There is a redirection of the human context. Away from human functionalities. Towards a system of control. While there seems to be a lot of bad dictators and ruthless, brutal, enforcements that are very damaging to humanity, that is silent evidence for them. They are more interested in, concerned with, preoccupied by their positions. [positions and waves] The problem with the uncertainty principal is accordingly misrepresented. Where there is no average they put one, and where there is one, they believe it not. I refer to the average “socially” is for persons to be at the effect of protocols. Protocols displace human relations. That is the mechanism )
Change in thinking average produces new arrangements of communications. Especially the flow of information. This makes it easier to question and change protocol's.
Narrower protocols reinforce power, dominance, oppression, wider protocols reinforce relationship, communication, learning etc.
Central interests effects on health care, abortion,
The need to recognize the wider distributed population.
ECONOMICS PROPERTIES LEAVE OUT IMPORTANT ELEMENTS. (also see video on socio-polito-econo clip with larger document on this blog site.) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QVClQabaVo&ab_channel=contextualexpansion
Popular studies in economics include things life privilege and underprivilidge.
Identifying elements of property and ownership does not address the problem of identifying societies, and individuals and predominantly economic units of production. Economics represents a centralized interest of severely limited contextualization. But it goes beyond limited characteristics into a severe mispredication of analysis that does not take into account the wider interest necessary for functionality. Indeed economics a highly specialized domain that is not developed to include these kinds of factors. We consistently return to the problem of centralized interest over functionality of communities.
Economics theories are blighted by their myopic concern of economics. While there is much than can be described by economic theory there is much more that is left out of consideration of economic theories. One thing left out of economics is how people work and live together. These things are described in economic forms first, and human conditions second, at a much lowered position.
Economic interests are a human invention. Community interests are an order of relationship closer to human activity. Community interest represent interests that are more directly related to
human existence. I think that is obvious. We could reframe that as community needs vs. economic needs. Economic needs do not relate as directly to human activity. Human needs like communication occur in more complex contexts and functions than economics. While economics could assist in human activity putting the economic interests first it has a narrower context than the the community one.
They are constrained by their mathematics as well. Economic theory is especially limited by its inability to include and take into consideration other properties that fall outside of current approaches. Such as exponential change pointed out by Nassim. (also see clips on exponential change on You Tube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BesxPtgQfA&ab_channel=contextualexpansion
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSfP6UOV7ZM&ab_channel=contextualexpansion
No comments:
Post a Comment